How To Set Aside A Default Judgment In California

As an experienced San Diego litigation chaser, this writer knows only how devastating it is when someone learns that a courtroom judgment has been entered against them without their noesis. This usually occurs via what is called a default judgment. The plaintiff serves a summons and complaint on the defendant and, later on the defendant fails to answer the complaint within the proscribed fourth dimension limit, asks the court to enter judgment in its favor. The problem is that sometimes, default judgments are entered against people that had no idea that a legal instance e'er existed. This tin can exist intentional where a plaintiff purposefully files a fraudulent proof of service claiming to have properly served the summons and complaint on the defendant, or unintentional where a plaintiff served the summons and complaint on an accost they believed to exist the Accused's correct accost. There are besides instances in which a accused may accept had knowledge of the case but for some excusable reason failed to participate in the case resulting in a judgment against them. Once a default judgment is entered confronting you, it is the same equally any judgment. With a judgment, a plaintiff can adhere bank accounts, garnish wages and put liens on real belongings, among other things.

Fortunately, California police provides defendants under these circumstances ways to set aside the default (substantially erasing information technology). Even so, timing is critical and it is of import to human activity fast in one case you learn that a judgment has been entered confronting you. Information technology's advisable to contact an experienced litigation lawyer in San Diego every bit shortly equally possible to avert missing important deadlines. Setting aside default judgments are governed by the following California law: California Lawmaking of Civil Procedure ("C.C.P.") §§ 473, 473.1 and 473.5.

Fault, Inadvertence, Surprise or Excusable Neglect (C.C.P. § 473(b))

Where a party fails to defend itself as a result of mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect, a courtroom has the discretion to set aside a default judgment. Examples of inadvertence and excusable neglect (substantially the same thing) include a disabling affliction, the reliance on an attorney that failed to act or the reliance on a courtroom officer that provided misinformation. Being also decorated, only forgetting almost the case or non existence able to afford counsel are not excusable reasons for setting aside a default. The brunt is upon the party seeking relief to nowadays bear witness showing the court that the inadvertence or neglect is excusable. To decide whether a parties failure to defend is excusable, courts look to whether a reasonably prudent person would have acted the same mode under the circumstances. There are 2 types of error: mistake of fact and mistake of law. A mistake of fact is where a person misunderstands the facts. A mistake of law is where a person misunderstands the law. Misunderstanding the police (ignorance) is not generally considered excusable error. However, the more than obscure the fact or law, the more than probable the error will be establish to be excusable. Surprise, a less common ground, is where "a political party is placed in an injurious legal situation, through no fault or negligence of their own, that ordinary prudence would not have guarded confronting."

A motion to set aside a default based on C.C.P. § 473(b) must be filed inside a reasonable time but in no case later than six months of the date the default was fix aside.

Void Judgments (C.C.P. § 473(d))

C.C.P. § 473(d) allows a court to gear up aside a default judgment at any time where the judgment is "void on its face". "Void on its face" ways that it is clear from the record that the judgment is defective in some fashion (without the need to present boosted evidence). If a party needs to testify that he or she was not served even though the proof of service says he was, than the judgment is not "void on its face" because extrinsic (exterior) evidence is required to challenge the legitimacy of the judgment. While a party may move for this relief at any fourth dimension, courts have held that the relief should exist requested in a reasonable fourth dimension frame.

Extrinsic Fraud or Error

Setting bated defaults based on extrinsic fraud or error is a not-statutory grounds for setting aside defaults. It is an equitable grade of relief giving courts the discretion to set aside defaults where a party is deprived of off-white notice. Extrinsic fraud is a broad category encompassing all circumstances where a political party was deliberately prevented from defending itself. Falsifying a proof of service is an example of extrinsic fraud. An example of extrinsic mistake is where a party relies on the representation of an incompetent attorney. The divergence betwixt extrinsic fraud or mistake and the intrinsic fault set forth above for C.C.P. § 473(b) is that for extrinsic mistake a party must be deprived of the opportunity to defend in an action. With an intrinsic error, the party may accept had the opportunity to defend the activeness just through an excusable mistake failed to reply in fourth dimension. While there is no statutory deadline in which to seek relief based on extrinsic fraud or fault, courts crave that parties diligently pursue such relief.

No Actual Notice (C.C.P. § 473.5))

No actual observe means that a party had no idea that a lawsuit existed even though service may have been achieved by some proper ways. A party seeking relief pursuant to C.C.P. § 473.v must demonstrate that he or she had no actual noesis that the suit existed. A motility to set up bated a default judgment based on C.C.P. § 473.5 must be filed within a reasonable time frame but in no case later than two years from the entry of judgment or 120 days after existence served with a written notice of entry of judgment whichever is sooner.

Courts have wide discretion when it comes to determining whether a move is brought inside a reasonable time frame or whether a political party acted diligently in pursuing relief. Every bit such, information technology is of import to seek the advice of an experienced litigation attorney in San Diego as soon every bit you learn that a judgment has been entered against you regardless of what forms of relief may be available to y'all.

Contact San Diego litigation attorney Donald R. Oder for more information.

Source: https://www.sandiegobusinesslawyerblog.com/setting-aside-default-judgments/

Share this post